‘Data Science for Actuaries’ survey shapes future objectives

The Singapore Actuarial Society’s Data Analytics Committee (DAC) and the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries’ GI Asia International Working Party (IFoA GI Asia WP) conducted a joint ‘Data Science for Actuaries’ survey in late-2021. What were the key findings, and how will they be utilised?

The survey was completed by DAC members and actuaries mainly across the Asia-Pacific region with the aim of:

  • finding out actuaries’ skill levels, interest and involvement in data science in their work;

  • identifying gaps in skills compared to the demand for data science skills in the market; and

  • steering DAC activities to narrow any gaps found in knowledge and skills through training courses, data science competitions, resources for self-learning, and seminars.

There were 75 responses collected from Singapore (27%), followed by China (20%), Malaysia (13%), Hong Kong (12%) and India (8%). There were also responses from the Philippines, Japan, Australia and the UK.

47% of respondents have more than 10 years’ experience, 15% with 5-10 years’ experience, and rest are actuaries and student actuaries with less than five years’ experience.

Key findings

Based on the responses, over 95% of respondents agreed that data science knowledge and skills are important for future career development.

Across all experience levels the majority of respondents had a basic to intermediate level of knowledge on data science concepts. The majority identified the lack of knowledge/skills as the main barrier to the development of data science in an organisation. Access to data and the availability of hardware/software were other major barriers. The lack of support from senior stakeholders also stood out.

Actuaries working in consulting or non-traditional companies (e.g. Insurtech) have identified themselves as being able to explain machine learning or even be part of the implementation team. 

Some respondents have considered or are considering switching career paths to a data science field. 43% responded ‘Maybe’ to a switch but the rest had a resounding no. Those with less than five years of experience were more positive about switching career paths to data science compared to respondents with more than five years of experience. It is clear that more experienced or senior respondents are hesitant to consider a career switch.

This was particularly evident with respondents over 10 years of experience. In addition, respondents in consulting and other industries were more willing to consider a career switch to data science, perhaps necessitated by the demands of their jobs. Respondents in general insurance and reinsurance were the most hesitant to consider a switch.

Surprisingly, over 30% of respondents indicated that there are no data scientists in their organisations and around 43% responded that there are 1-5 data scientists in the company. This provides a great opportunity for actuaries to step into data science field in their organisations. However, a majority indicated that they have less than 30% involvement in data science-related work in their organisations.

64% responded that a data science team owns the data science function in their organisation. 37% responded that actuaries own it. In fact, it shows that actuaries are in a strong position to promote data science in an organisation.

The majority of respondents identified machine learning or artificial intelligence algorithms and modelling techniques as the most important skills data scientists can teach actuaries. Again, this indicates that actuaries are well aware of skill requirements to step into data science field. A majority were able to follow or contribute to machine learning discussions related to business.

According to the respondents, the most popular tools used are AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform for Cloud platform; Excel and Power BI for visualisation; SAS, SQL, Python and Excel for modelling. Some other tools have also been mentioned, such as Alteryx, Power Pivot, Databricks, Emblem. Examples of use cases provided by the respondents include marketing cost distribution, sales analytics, lifetime value model, pricing/reserving/capital model processes, underwriting monitoring, reserving dashboard, API and web scraping, fraud detection, abuse and waste models, experience analysis, efficiency and persistency studies, prediction modelling, etc.

Online courses and material, seminars, learning from peers, and books were identified as main sources to develop data science skills. Many had a preference for seminars and online tutorials/learning material. Blogs, YouTube, course forums and journal publications were the preferred online media sources to access data science topics.

Given that many respondents were already accessing online material, not surprisingly, a majority responded positively to setting up an online repository with data science learning material by the DAC and data science courses sponsored by SAS/IFoA.

In the past, the DAC had organised data science competitions with a great level of participation by actuaries as well as other professionals. However, many respondents were lukewarm towards participating in such competitions in the future. This could be mainly attributed to the lack of data science skills or the perceived idea that such competitions require a high level of skills to participate.

Conclusion and next steps

In conclusion, most respondents recognise the importance of data science skills for the actuarial profession and future career development. However, not all actuaries are equipped with in-depth data science knowledge, and the level of involvement in data science work within their organisations remains low. Although there are several resources for learning, hands-on training and professional courses tailored for the actuarial profession are still limited. The survey has also identified a growing demand for data science experience in organisations.

As the next steps to this survey, the DAC will be studying the future prospects of data science adoption within the actuarial profession and making a further recommendation in enabling interested members to adopt and implement data science successfully within their organisation.

Check out the survey’s findings, read the survey questions, and familiarise yourself with the response summary

CPD: Actuaries Institute Members can claim two CPD points for every hour of reading articles on Actuaries Digital.


No comments.

Comment on the article (Be kind)

Your comment will be revised by the site if needed.